2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Juan Raul Garza v. Harley G. Lappin, Warden.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Juan Raul Garza v. Harley G. Lappin, Warden Anchor | green | “is an aspirational document which ... did not on its own create any enforceable obligations on the part of any of the oas member nations.” | 3 |
| 2 | Flores v. Southern Peru Copper Corp. | green | “plaintiffs had not demonstrated that high levels of environmental pollution ... violate any well-established rules of customary international law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.