2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kenneth Biros, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Margaret Bagley, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kenneth Biros, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Margaret Bagley, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee Anchor | green | “contemporaneous objection rule is an adequate and independent state ground barring federal habeas review, biros v. bagley, 422 f.3d 379, 387 (6th cir. 2005), and that plain-error review is not inconsistent with the procedural default.” | 3 |
| 2 | Anthony Mason v. Timothy Brunsman | green | “the state court's plain error review did not constitute a waiver of the procedural default.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.