Topic: the mere happening of an accident at the workplace, not cau… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #4426

7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 75 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Plumb Rite Plumbing Service v. Barbour.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Plumb Rite Plumbing Service v. Barbour Anchor
vactapp · 1989
green “the mere happening of an accident at the workplace, not caused by any work related risk or significant work related exertion, is not compensable.” 24
2 Chesterfield County/Fire Dept. v. Dunn
vactapp · 1990
green “(1) an identifiable incident; (2) that occurs at some reasonably definite time; (3) an obvious sudden mechanical or structural change in the body; and (4) a causal connection between the incident and the bodily change.” 13
3 Plumb Rite Plumbing Service v. Barbour
vactapp · 1989
green “that the conditions of the workplace or . . . some significant work related exertion caused the injury.” 10
4 Kane Plumbing, Inc. v. Small
vactapp · 1988
green “in order to recover on a workers' compensation claim, a claimant must prove: (1) an injury by accident, (2) arising out of and (3) in the course of his employment.” 10
5 Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Musick
vactapp · 1989
green “the actual determination of causation is a factual finding that will not be disturbed on appeal,” 9
6 County of Chesterfield v. Johnson
va · 1989
green “the phrase arising 'in the course of' refers to the time, place, and circumstances under which the accident occurred,” 6
7 Jones v. Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
vactapp · 1989
green “whether an injury arises out of and in the course of employment is a mixed question of law and fact . . . , reviewable upon appeal.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check