2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Union Carbide Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Union Carbide Corp. Anchor | green | “there will be no way to untangle how or whether prejudice and confusion infected the jury's deliberations.” | 3 |
| 2 | In Re Levi Strauss & Co. | green | “does not outweigh the potential that prejudice and jury confusion will result from a single trial” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.