2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Vladimir Oliva v. Loretta Lynch.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vladimir Oliva v. Loretta Lynch Anchor | green | “extortion itself can constitute persecution, even if the targeted individual will be physically harmed only upon failure to pay.” | 4 |
| 2 | Quinteros-Mendoza v. Holder | green | “be the central reason or even a dominant central reason for persecution,” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.