9 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 75 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Farrington's Owners' Ass'n v. Conway Lake Resorts, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farrington's Owners' Ass'n v. Conway Lake Resorts, Inc. Anchor | green | “when the evidence requires a fact-finder to choose between competing versions of the truth.” | 13 |
| 2 | Lever v. Acadia Hospital Corp. | green | “there is sufficient evidence to require a fact-finder to choose between competing versions of the truth at trial.” | 12 |
| 3 | Tondreau v. Sherwin-Williams Co. | green | “a court may properly enter judgment in a case when the parties are not in dispute over the material facts, but differ only as to the legal conclusion to be drawn from these facts.” | 12 |
| 4 | Lever v. Acadia Hospital Corp. | green | “a genuine issue of material fact exists when there is sufficient evidence to require a fact-finder to choose between competing versions of the truth at trial.” | 11 |
| 5 | Farrington's Owners' Ass'n v. Conway Lake Resorts, Inc. | green | “could potentially affect the outcome of the suit.” | 11 |
| 6 | Farrington's Owners' Ass'n v. Conway Lake Resorts, Inc. | green | “a genuine issue of material fact exists when the evidence requires a fact-finder to choose between competing versions of the truth.” | 5 |
| 7 | Lever v. Acadia Hospital Corp. | green | “are competing versions of the truth” | 4 |
| 8 | Doyle v. Department of Human Services | green | “must explicitly admit, deny, or qualify facts by reference to each numbered paragraph, and a denial or qualification must be supported by a record citation.” | 4 |
| 9 | Stanley v. Hancock County Commissioners | green | “facts contained in a supporting or opposing statement of material facts, if supported by record citations as required by this rule, shall be deemed admitted unless properly controverted.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.