2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Elk Hills Power v. Board of Equalization.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elk Hills Power v. Board of Equalization Anchor | green | “using the income approach, an appraiser estimates 'the future income stream a prospective purchaser could expect to receive from the enterprise and then discounts that amount to a present value by use of a capitalization rate.' in other words, the fair market value of an income …” | 3 |
| 2 | Farr v. County of Nevada | green | “should include all legally relevant subconclusions supportive of its ultimate decision so that a reviewing court is able to trace and adequately examine the board's mode of analysis,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.