2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kovalaske v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kovalaske v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “the evidence in the light most favorable to the commonwealth.” | 3 |
| 2 | Joshua Dadzie Anaman, s/k/a Joshua E. Dadzie-Anaman v. Commonwealth of Virginia | green | “whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.