4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 75 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jose Duran-Rodriguez v. William Barr.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jose Duran-Rodriguez v. William Barr Anchor | green | “where, as here, the bia agrees with the ij decision and also adds its own reasoning, we review the decision of the bia and those parts of the ij's decision upon which it relies.” | 47 |
| 2 | Garland v. Ming Dai | green | “unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” | 13 |
| 3 | Mr. Budiono v. Loretta E. Lynch | green | “unless the evidence compels a contrary result.” | 8 |
| 4 | Alfaro Manzano v. Garland | green | “we review factual findings for substantial evidence and legal questions de novo.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.