2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund Anchor | green | “simply a confession of an inability to identify a cause of the claimant's impairments rather than evidence that the claimant's condition or impairment is unrelated to his or her employment.” | 3 |
| 2 | SAIF Corp. v. Thompson | green | “viewed semler's opinion as inadequate to overcome the presumption because it lacked proof of the ultimate cause of claimant's atherosclerosis.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.