2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Rio Rancho Estates, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Rio Rancho Estates, Inc. Anchor | green | “when determining the extent of a municipal water right, it is appropriate for the court to look to a city's planned future use of water from the well caused by an increasing population.” | 3 |
| 2 | City & County of Denver v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District | green | “when appropriations are sought by a growing city, regard should be given to its reasonably anticipated requirements.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.