2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bd. of Cty. Com'rs, Etc. v. Teton Cty., Etc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bd. of Cty. Com'rs, Etc. v. Teton Cty., Etc. Anchor | green | “the opposition of neighbors is not one of the considerations to be taken into account” | 3 |
| 2 | Thurston v. Cache County | green | “the consent of neighboring landowners may not be made a criterion for the issuance or denial of a conditional use permit.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.