2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Madrid v. St. Joseph Hospital.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madrid v. St. Joseph Hospital Anchor | green | “prohibiting the legislature from adopting the standards developed by experts within a rapidly changing medical specialty would obstruct the workers' compensation administration's efforts to provide accurate evaluations of impairment.” | 3 |
| 2 | Protz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board | green | “it is hard to see what other basic policy choices remain to be made.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.