2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mallin v. Farmers Insurance Exchange.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mallin v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Anchor | green | “is clearly in the best position to determine whether allowing an appeal would frustrate the purpose for which the cases were consolidated.” | 3 |
| 2 | Randall v. Salvation Army | green | “several actions are combined into one, lose their separate identities and become a single action” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.