2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Andrysek v. Andrysek.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrysek v. Andrysek Anchor | green | “a sham plea is one good in form but false in fact; it is a pretense because it is not pleaded in good faith.” | 3 |
| 2 | Kashmir Corp. v. Nelson | green | “a pleading may be stricken as sham when its allegations appear false on the face of the pleading.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.