2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Metts v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Metts v. State Anchor | green | “the victim's perception is not an element of the offense.” | 3 |
| 2 | Gray v. Robinson | green | “all motions for continuance must be sworn to by a person having personal knowledge of the facts relied on for the continuance.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.