2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gustafson v. Zumbrunnen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gustafson v. Zumbrunnen Anchor | green | “cases decided since marshall suggest that claims that would add assets to an estate, but do not reallocate those assets among claimants or creditors, do not disturb a state probate court's possession of property.” | 3 |
| 2 | Gecker v. Flynn | green | “cases decided since marshall suggest that claims that would add assets to an estate, but do not reallocate those assets among claimants or creditors, do not disturb a state probate court's possession of property.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.