2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Burns v. Vowell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burns v. Vowell Anchor | green | “living together does not mean living apart, even in the eye of the public welfare division.” | 3 |
| 2 | Franssen v. Juras | green | “living together does not mean living apart, even in the eye of the public welfare division.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.