2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Aid Pack, Inc. v. Beecham, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aid Pack, Inc. v. Beecham, Inc. Anchor | green | “the rules do not change simply because the case involves patent law.” | 3 |
| 2 | Procter & Gamble Co. v. Nabisco Brands, Inc. | green | “summary judgment is appropriate in patent cases as in other cases under rule 56(c).” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.