2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Broaca v. Broaca.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Broaca v. Broaca Anchor | green | “the statutory grant of jurisdiction to the trial court in matters relating to child support incident to the dissolution of a marriage expressly circumscribes the court's jurisdiction to orders involving only 'minor children.” | 3 |
| 2 | Zaabel v. Konetski | green | “the duration of the support obligation remains fixed despite the subsequent residence of all parties in a new state with a different duration of child support.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.