2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Howard.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Howard Anchor | green | “to prove that it was rational to treat children that have the same characteristics as bloyer the same way as an adult offender.” | 3 |
| 2 | Mobley v. Armstrong | green | “the burden is on the party claiming a violation of equal protection to establish that the statutory distinction is without a rational basis.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.