2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from CIVIC ASS'N OF DEAF OF NYC v. Giuliani.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CIVIC ASS'N OF DEAF OF NYC v. Giuliani Anchor | green | “when such common questions do predominate, differences among the questions raised by individual members will not defeat commonality.” | 3 |
| 2 | Weissman v. ABC Financial Services, Inc. | green | “courts may make common sense assumptions to support a finding of numerosity.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.