2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Ruiz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Ruiz Anchor | green | “in order to apply this doctrine, there does not have to be an absolute certainty of discovery, but rather, just a reasonable probability.” | 3 |
| 2 | Craig v. State | green | “means of normal investigative measures that inevitably would have been set in motion as a matter of routine police procedure.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.