2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Advo-Systems, Inc v. Department of Treasury.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Advo-Systems, Inc v. Department of Treasury Anchor | green | “recourse to the dictionary is unnecessary when the legislative intent may be readily discerned from reading the statute itself.” | 3 |
| 2 | DIALLO v. LaROCHELLE | green | “a statute is not ambiguous merely because a term it contains is undefined.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.