2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In the Interest of R. D..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In the Interest of R. D. Anchor | green | “he wanted to talk to his mother” | 3 |
| 2 | Mayes v. State | green | “i have to get one for both of us” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.