2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The Florida Bar v. Mogil.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Florida Bar v. Mogil Anchor | green | “must come forward with counterevidence sufficient to reveal a genuine issue.” | 3 |
| 2 | Landers v. Milton | green | “competent evidence to support the motion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.