2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Parker v. STATE OF FLORIDA BD. OF REGENTS.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parker v. STATE OF FLORIDA BD. OF REGENTS Anchor | green | “equated with the actual malice standard.” | 3 |
| 2 | Eiras v. Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco | green | “the subjective intent to do wrong.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.