2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Muncy Creek Township Citizens Committee v. Shipman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muncy Creek Township Citizens Committee v. Shipman Anchor | green | “in order to sustain such a preliminary objection, it must appear with certainty that the law will not permit recovery, and, where any doubt exists as to whether the preliminary objections should be sustained, that doubt should be resolved by a refusal to sustain it.” | 3 |
| 2 | Keller v. McGowan | green | “preliminary objections, the standard of review is de novo and the scope of review is plenary.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.