2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Adoption of T.M.F..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Adoption of T.M.F. Anchor | green | “employ a broad, comprehensive review of the record” | 3 |
| 2 | In Re Adoption by Shives | green | “absent an abuse of discretion, an error of law, or insufficient evidentiary support for the findings of the orphans' court, we will not reverse a hearing court's decision to terminate.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.