2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People Ex Rel. Madigan v. Kinzer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People Ex Rel. Madigan v. Kinzer Anchor | green | “any violation of the illinois controlled substances act” | 3 |
| 2 | People ex rel. Madigan v. Illinois Commerce Comm'n | green | “substantial weight and deference to an interpretation of an ambiguous statute by the agency charged with the administration and enforcement of the statute” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.