2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tober Foreign Motors, Inc. v. Reiter Oldsmobile, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tober Foreign Motors, Inc. v. Reiter Oldsmobile, Inc. Anchor | green | “the 1977 revision sets out a quite sharp definition which may somewhat sacrifice theoretical correctness to ease of practical application” | 3 |
| 2 | Ricky Smith Pontiac, Inc. v. Subaru of New England, Inc. | green | “in fact, of course, each dealer's area would probably be irregular in shape.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.