2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Guerrant v. Roth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guerrant v. Roth Anchor | green | “the rationale for this standard is that a party challenging a trial court's decision regarding attorney fees is actually challenging the trial court's discretion in determining what is reasonable.” | 3 |
| 2 | Pietrzyk v. Oak Lawn Pavilion, Inc. | green | “the rationale for this standard is that a party challenging a trial court's decision regarding attorney fees is actually challenging the trial court's discretion in determining what is reasonable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.