2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Branch.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Branch Anchor | green | “the fact that a complaint is made in response to questioning does not necessarily destroy its admissibility.” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Sharp | green | “reliable and not the result of adult prompting or manipulation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.