3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 73 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Salzer v. SSM Health Care of Oklahoma Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salzer v. SSM Health Care of Oklahoma Inc. Anchor | green | “the party invoking federal jurisdiction has the burden to establish that it is proper, and there is a presumption against its existence.” | 40 |
| 2 | Kenney v. Helix TCS | green | “a rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss only requires the court to determine whether it has authority to adjudicate the matter.” | 21 |
| 3 | Cristina Galeas Castaneda v. Immigration & Naturalization Service | green | “in the presence rather than the absence of statutory authority.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.