2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hall Bros. Construction Co. v. Mercantile National Bank of Indiana.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hall Bros. Construction Co. v. Mercantile National Bank of Indiana Anchor | green | “if a jury could come to different conclusions from the undisputed facts, then summary judgment is inappropriate.” | 3 |
| 2 | Bochnowski v. PEOPLES FEDERAL S. & L. | green | “summary judgment should not be granted if the facts give rise to conflicting inferences which would alter the outcome.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.