Topic: a valuable privilege that should not be unduly restricted. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #4559

5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 73 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Terry v. State.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Terry v. State Anchor
tenn · 2001
green “a valuable privilege that should not be unduly restricted.” 18
2 Terry v. State
tenn · 2001
green “consequently, attorneys are given greater leeway in arguing their positions before the jury, and the trial court has significant discretion in controlling these arguments, to be reversed only upon a showing of an abuse of that discretion.” 17
3 State v. Goltz
tenncrimapp · 2003
green “(1) the facts and circumstances of the case; (2) any curative measures undertaken by the court and the prosecutor; (3) the intent of the prosecution; (4) the cumulative effect of the improper conduct and any other errors in the record; and (5) the relative strength or weakness o…” 17
4 Terry v. State
tenn · 2001
green “has long recognized that closing arguments are a valuable privilege that should not be unduly restricted.” 14
5 Coker v. State
tenncrimapp · 1995
green “closing arguments must be temperate, based upon the evidence introduced at trial, relevant to the issues being tried, and not otherwise improper under the facts or law.” 7

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check