2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Van Cleave.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Van Cleave Anchor | green | “the often nettlesome question of whether the attorney's performance was objectively unreasonable.” | 3 |
| 2 | Curtis v. State | green | “considerable discretion in choosing strategy and tactics, and we will accord those decisions deference.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.