2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Marriage of Spent.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Marriage of Spent Anchor | green | “because the trial court was in a far better position to observe the temperaments and personalities of the parties and assess their credibility.” | 3 |
| 2 | Young v. Herman | green | “strong and compelling presumption in favor of the result reached by the trial court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.