2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from D'ANTUONO v. Service Road Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | D'ANTUONO v. Service Road Corp. Anchor | green | “in some rare cases, a contractual provision may be so outrageous as to warrant a court's refusal to enforce it based on substantive unconscionability alone.” | 3 |
| 2 | DAIMLERCHRYSLER INS. CO., LLC v. Pambianchi | green | “under connecticut law, a court cannot find procedural unconscionability unless the party opposing enforcement of a contractual provision has introduced some specific evidence of overreaching by the other party in the formation of the agreement.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.