2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Whyte v. Schlage Lock Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whyte v. Schlage Lock Company Anchor | green | “this doctrine is contrary to california law and policy because it creates an after-the-fact covenant not to compete restricting employee mobility.” | 3 |
| 2 | Roger Cleveland Golf Co. v. Krane & Smith, APC | green | “the applicable statute of limitations for malicious prosecution is code of civil procedure section 335.1, irrespective of whether the party being sued for malicious prosecution is the former adversary . . . or the adversary's attorneys . . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.