2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from B & T DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. White.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B & T DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. White Anchor | green | “the purpose of a notice of lis pendens is to put those interested in a particular tract of land on inquiry about the facts and the issues involved in the suit and to put prospective buyers on notice that they acquire any interest subject to the outcome of the pending litigation.” | 3 |
| 2 | First National Petroleum Corp. v. Lloyd | green | “mandamus has been recognized as the appropriate remedy when issues have arisen concerning the issuance of notices of lis pendens.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.