10 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 73 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Caldwell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Caldwell Anchor | green | “the jury believed the state's witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.” | 11 |
| 2 | State v. Andersen | green | “consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt.” | 8 |
| 3 | State v. Ortega | green | “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the conviction,” | 8 |
| 4 | Bernhardt v. State | green | “direct evidence is evidence that is based on personal knowledge or observation and that, if true, proves a fact without inference or presumption.” | 7 |
| 5 | Bernhardt v. State | green | “evidence that is based on personal knowledge or observation and that, if true, proves a fact without inference or presumption” | 7 |
| 6 | State v. Moore | green | “determine whether the circumstances proved are consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt.” | 6 |
| 7 | State v. Moore | green | “assume that the jury resolved any factual disputes in a manner that is consistent with the jury's verdict.” | 5 |
| 8 | State v. Moore | green | “identify the circumstances proved.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.