2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Woods.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Woods Anchor | green | “the existence of arguably more persuasive means of corroboration i.e., controlled buy, observations of specifically prohibited transactions, or confirmation with other informants did not by itself render insufficient that information which was produced by police action.” | 3 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Carter | green | “even in a case where one could say that the conduct of a person is equally consistent with innocent activity, the suppression court is not foreclosed from concluding that reasonable suspicion nevertheless existed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.