2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole Anchor | green | “demonstrates that the board exercised discretion in denying inmate credit for time he spent at liberty on parole,” | 4 |
| 2 | Santiago v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole | green | “that part of an existing judicially imposed sentence that a parole violator is required to serve as a result of violating the terms of conditions of parole prior to being eligible to again apply for parole.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.