2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Johnson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Johnson Anchor | green | “it does not seem that factor 7 was written with possessors of child pornography in mind” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Palladino | green | “defendant has already been prosecuted for the offense” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.