3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Katare v. Katare.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Katare v. Katare Anchor | neutral | “must be reasonably calculated to address the identified harm.” | 2 |
| 2 | In re the Marriage of Katare | green | “any limitations or restrictions imposed must be reasonably calculated to address the identified harm.” | 2 |
| 3 | In re the Marriage of Katare | green | “must be reasonably calculated to address the identified harm.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.