2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Metcalf Associates-2000, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Metcalf Associates-2000, LLC Anchor | green | “a party need not risk contempt of court to avoid an accusation of acquiescence.” | 3 |
| 2 | IAS Partners, Ltd. v. Chambers | green | “a party need not risk contempt of court to avoid an accusation of acquiescence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.