2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Public Employees' Benefits Program v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Employees' Benefits Program v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Anchor | green | “int is the duty of this court, when possible, to interpret provisions within a common statutory scheme harmoniously with one another in accordance with the general purpose of those statutes and to avoid unreasonable or absurd results, thereby giving effect to the legislature's i…” | 3 |
| 2 | Rucker v. Schmidt | green | “arthough attorneys in the discharge of their professional duties are, in a restricted sense, agents of their clients, this agency is distinguishable from other agency relationships . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.