4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 72 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris Anchor | green | “to promote stability in labor-management relations by providing a comprehensive framework for resolving labor disputes.” | 26 |
| 2 | Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris | green | “congress' purpose in passing the rla was to promote stability in labor-management relations by providing a comprehensive framework for resolving labor disputes.” | 19 |
| 3 | Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris | green | “grow out of grievances or out of the interpretation or application of agreements covering rates of pay, rules, or working conditions.” | 19 |
| 4 | Terry J. Eckles v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, United Transportation Union International, and United Transportation Union Local 1963 | green | “the ada does not require disabled individuals to be accommodated by sacrificing the collectively bargained, bona fide seniority rights of other employees.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.