2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James Roane v. Michele Leonhart.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James Roane v. Michele Leonhart Anchor | green | “a district court must grant a timely motion to intervene that seeks to protect an interest that might be impaired by the action and that is not adequately represented by the parties.” | 3 |
| 2 | Wildearth Guardians v. Salazar | green | “in most instances, the standing inquiry will fold into the underlying inquiry under rule 24(a): generally speaking, when a putative intervenor has a 'legally protected' interest under rule 24(a), it will also meet constitutional standing requirements, and vice versa.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.